Bolivia dating com

Within this valley, younger and lower lake plains are lacking (Lavenu 1981: Fig. I have also examined the "wharf" described by Posnansky (1943).

So far, I find the same lack of evidence for it having been a "wharf" as for Tiwanaku having ever been a port.

He was studying a site severely damaged by stone mining, looting, and vandalism.

As a result, even his pains-taking study of the site would have been badly skewed by the severe disturbance to this site.

[NOTE: The actual lake port was at Iwawe which was connected to Tiwanaku by a land road (Browman 1981).] AD, long after Plato. It is not that his "view" that is unpopular among archaeologists. Kolata, Alan L., 1993, The Tiwanaku: portrait of an Andean civilization. Kolata, Alan L., 1996, Tiwanaku and Its Hinterland: Archaeology and Paleoecology of an Andean Civilization, University of Chicago, Chicago. Heinrich All comments are the [email protected] opinion of the writer and Baton Rouge, LA do not constitute policy and/or opinion of government or corporate entities. "To persons uninstructed in natural history, their country or seaside stroll is a walk through a gallery filled with wonderful works of art, nine-tenths of which have their faces turned to the wall." - T.

This claim has become part of the mythology surrounding Tiwanaku that various authors blindly repeat without evaluating the facts for themselves.

Unfortunately, these have all taken place extensively at Tiwanaku.

First, Tiwanaku, including the Kalasasaya, have been badly damaged by the mining of stones within, defacing of structures, and altered by well-meaning, but ill-considered reconstructions.

Because there exists no documentation of the stonework removed prior to the research of Posnansky (1943) and their location, it is virtually impossible to know how the configuration of sight lines have been altered. 3-15, Lake Titicaca: A Synthesis of Limnological Knowledge. Posnansky, Arthur, 1943, Tihuanacu: the Cradle of American Man.

Also, it is virtually impossible to know that the alignments used by Posnansky (1943) to date the structure are either parts of the same sight line, fragments of unrelated sight lines, or even deliberately constructed with astronomical alignments in mind.

Leave a Reply